![]() And I observed people mention roundcube 'elegant'.īearing in mind the attitudes of end users, I can say if the inward nature of virtualmin & usermin is combined to simplicity and attractiveness (which is seeked for by most people) I am sure most of them will prefer using this indispensable duo.įine intelligence and labour behind them is clear but - concerning end users- it needs to be integrated into simple and more attractive form. Last week, while surfing to find comperative information about CPs I met someone saying 'ugly virtualmin' and I deduced virtualmin must be good (since I am aware that most of the end-user-type people are after appearance more than function) and Now I am sure webmin&virtualmin are really functional and do meet more than needs. I will share my observation in case it gives an idea. I prefer using mail client on my computer. Why do I choose squirrelmail over usermin? Personally I do not have any preferences about webmail client. my homework :) I will keep in mind and learn about it. I got impression that Webmin and virtualmin are really good products compared to other CPs and has more advantages. That is why I spent all the week setting up ubuntu, webmin, virtualmin, roundcube again and again trying to understand approach, logic and concerns behind them. I am only a person who loves learning - especially self learning. I just want to know how we can further improve Usermin.) -)įirst of all, I should say I am not very skilled person about linux, webmin and virtualmin. (We're not going to beat you up about it. So I'm going to bug folks again about why they're choosing Squirrel over Usermin. If you must have it work this way, you'll need to create a special non-suexec VirtualHost for running SquirrelMail.īTW-Can I get your thoughts on why you prefer SquirrelMail to Usermin? I'd like to know what we're doing wrong (I bugged people a few years ago about this, and we introduced the framed theme that give Usermin a more 'mail client' appearance), but that doesn't seem to have convinced everybody. The files in the central installation are owned by the Apache user.so suexec tries to run them as the Apache user, but Suexec refuses to allow that to happen, because the SuexecUserGroup doesn't match the Apache user. Suexec will not allow a central installation to run within the VirtualHost sections of your virtual servers. You shouldn't need to use any fancy rewriting unless you're trying to do something particularly unusual :-)Įric's advice is spot-on for the easy ways to do this, but I'll add one thing that may not be immediately obvious about the way you're trying to do this: If you create a single Virtual Server for your Squirrelmail install, you can make the name anything you want. To do that, go into System Settings -> Server Templates -> Default -> Apache Website, and modify 'URL for webmail redirect'.ģ. You can have it so that any user who types '' will end up at this central Squirrelmail install. This will create a centralized install of Squirrelmail that will allow it to be available for all users.Ģ. My suggestion would be that if you want to use Squirrelmail, you first create a new Virtual Server for it - something like, and setup Squirrelmail within the public_html directory it creates for you. If you're using a typical Virtualmin setup, you'll have trouble getting things to work in a DocumentRoot outside of /home. I want the squirrelmail full url not shownlike " in the browser, instead I Like to have "" Do I have to use rewrite url to achive this?ġ. ![]() Is there a place to add the code above so it will be available globallyģ. Am I on the right way to achive what I want?Ģ. ![]() I tried to add lines below to "Directives and settings for new websites"īut it gave error. At the moment I am trying to find a way to install globally under a subdomain like - that is whenever I create a web site I want a webmail sobdoamin like above to be created for new site. For a few days I have been trying webmin and virtualmin. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |